Course-scheduling study, NYIT
Graduate Research Assistant, Data Science · Jan 2025 – Jun 2026 · [with Dr. Cecilia Dong — confirm ok to name]
- Challenge
- The department needed a factual picture of how sections, meeting times, and enrollment were actually distributed across the schedule, and where that diverged from peer targets. [confirm framing]
- Action
- Cleaned and reconciled 15,242 raw registrar records into 8,729 sections and 11,803 meeting instances, then defined and computed the metrics that mattered: time-of-day share, overenrollment by format, Friday load.
- Result
- 40.9% of meetings fell in the morning against a 30–35% peer target; 24.2% of lectures were overenrolled; 10.0% of meetings sat on Fridays. Scope: 3,300+ undergraduates. [where the findings went / what changed — fill]